HSBC fined £10.5m for mis-selling to elderly - Investments - News - Moneyfacts


HSBC fined £10.5m for mis-selling to elderly

HSBC fined £10.5m for mis-selling to elderly

Category: Investments

Updated: 14/12/2012
First Published: 05/12/2011

This article was correct at the time of publication. It is now over 6 months old so the content may be out of date.

HSBC has been hit with the biggest ever retail fine of £10.5 million for giving inappropriate advice to elderly customers between 2005 and 2010.

The advice was provided through one of its subsidiaries NHFA – which has since been closed to new business – with HSBC also facing a bill of £29.3 million to be paid out in compensation to customers.

The fine was handed down by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), with the regulator describing the case as the type that 'undermines confidence in the financial services sector.'

Almost 2,500 customers were advised to invest in asset-backed investment products by NHFA, typically investment bonds, to fund long-term care during the five year period.

The products were sold to individuals entering, or already in, long-term care and in many cases these elderly customers were reliant on the investments to pay for their care.

Typically these investments are recommended for a minimum period of five years, but in a number of cases the customer's life expectancy was less than five years.

It meant customers with shorter life expectancies had to make withdrawals from these investments sooner than is recommended. The combination of withdrawals and product charges led to a faster reduction of capital than should have been the case if customers had received the right advice.

On average, customers invested approximately £115,000, meaning a total of close to £285 million was placed in the products.

A review of the case found that almost nine in ten (87%) of customers were unsuitable for such products.

The FSA said it was clear that HSBC's subsidiary, NHFA, had not considered the individual needs of its elderly customers and failed in many cases to recommend suitable products for their circumstances, for example higher fixed interest rate savings accounts and ISAs.

The failings of NHFA were found to be significant because of the vulnerability of the customer base, with an average age of 83, while the company was the leading provider of independent financial advice on long-term care products to help pay for care costs.

HSBC agreed to settle at an early stage entitling it to a 30% discount on its fine, and has also been credited with demonstrating a commitment to making changes to its operations.

"NHFA was trusted by its vulnerable and elderly customers. It breached that trust to sell them unsuitable products. This type of behaviour undermines confidence in the financial services sector," said Tracey McDermott, acting director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA.

"HSBC, who owned NHFA, has now recognised the issues and taken steps to do the right thing. They have been given credit for that - but for some customers it will be too late.

"This penalty should serve as a warning to firms that they must have the right systems and controls in place to manage and identify risks when they acquire new businesses.

"A failure to do so can lead not only to detriment to their customers but to significant reputational and regulatory cost."

Find the best bank account for you - compare bank accounts

Disclaimer: Information is correct as of the date of publication (shown at the top of this article). Any products featured may be withdrawn by their provider or changed at any time.

Related Articles

Pound plummets as FTSE soars

A second significant fall in the pound has taken place. While this drop may be unhappy news for people who are about to go on holiday, it has given the FTSE 100 quite a boost, as it has passed the 7,000 mark for the second time in as many years.

Would you risk the stock market for £400,000?

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to secure decent returns on cash savings these days, yet we all know that investing in cash is the safest option. But would you risk that level of security for the chance of a £400,000 profit?

Don’t be a victim of investment fraud

Low savings rates have led many of us to desperately scour the market in hopes of finding a deal that will pay more. However, this search means that more and more savers are being tempted by unfamiliar investments.