Consumers disillusioned with Supreme Court ruling - Money - News - Moneyfacts

News

Moneyfacts.co.uk News brings you the latest financial & economic news & reviews of the best products in the UK by our team of money experts.

Consumers disillusioned with Supreme Court ruling

Consumers disillusioned with Supreme Court ruling

Category: Money

Updated: 18/12/2009
First Published: 25/11/2009

MONEYFACTS ARCHIVE
This article was correct at the time of publication. It is now over 6 months old so the content may be out of date.

The decision of the Supreme Court to rule in favour of the UK banks in their case against the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has been labelled a 'shock.'

It had been expected that the court would allow the OFT to consider what constituted a fair bank charge, paving the way for consumers to claim back billions of pounds in overdraft fees.

However, over a million people were left disappointed this morning with the news that banks would not have to pay back the charges.

"The shock decision by the Supreme Court is going to leave some consumers even more disillusioned with banks. Consumers have seen billions of pounds pumped into a number of banks, but many feel they have seen little benefit," commented Michelle Slade, spokesperson for Moneyfacts.co.uk.

Delivering his verdict, the Supreme Court's president, Lord Phillips, did offer consumers slight hope, saying that the OFT could challenge the fairness of bank charges under other regulation.

"Consumers will be hoping the OFT continues to pursue the case and that it looks down other potential avenues," added Ms Slade.

Consumer groups have expressed their disappointment, with Which? describing the verdict as 'a bitter blow for millions of people who have been patiently waiting to get their bank charges back.'

The Financial Services Consumer Panel also spoke out against the decision, criticising banks for funding their retail banking operations through charging high rates to one section to their customers.

In a statement, the British Banking Association said: "The Banks acknowledge the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court to allow their appeal in respect of these charges.

"We recognise this issue has been of real concern to a large number of our customers and we are pleased that this decision now brings clarity for all parties.

"The Banks will work with the regulators to ensure that the outstanding customer complaints are brought to a swift conclusion. We will also continue to work together with the OFT in connection with its on-going Market study."

Find the best bank account for you - compare bank accounts

Disclaimer: Information is correct as of the date of publication (shown at the top of this article). Any products featured may be withdrawn by their provider or changed at any time.

Related Articles

Have your financial habits changed?

2016 was certainly a turbulent year, and it's had a notable impact on household finances. Indeed, research shows that recent events have influenced the way over half of UK respondents manage their finances, with many becoming more cautious.

Kids got £180 in pocket money in 2016

New research has revealed that kids aged 4-14 received an average of £180.44 in pocket money over the last year, which was topped up by an additional £47 on average received in cash over the Christmas period.

How much could it cost to get fit in 2017?

We’re almost a week into 2017, and hopefully, many of those New Year’s Resolutions are still going strong. Figures suggest that the most popular resolution is to achieve a healthier lifestyle, but just how much could that ambition set you back?
 
Close